Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 4011 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of FX-4300
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $48.02 vs $417.61
- Up to 15% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i9-14900KF - $0.86 vs $1.01 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 639% better in League of Legends than FX-4300 - 414 vs 56 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 32 vs 4 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
414
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.01/FPS
85%
Price, $
$417.61
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $417.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-4300 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |