In The Last of Us Part II, the FX-4300 is faster than the Core i9-14900K and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $408 cheaper!
FX-4300
- Up to 19% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 202 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 90% cheaper – $42.94 vs $451.09
- Up to 90% cheaper
- Up to 92% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.21 vs $2.65/FPS
- Up to 92% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Core i9-14900K
- Is 10 years and 11 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 10 years and 11 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
FX-4300 vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
202 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
152 FPS
100%
Price, $
$42.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
170 FPS
84%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
84%
Price, $
$451.09
9%
Value, $/FPS
$2.65/FPS
8%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4300 vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4300 vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
67%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
