In Atomfall, the FX-4300 is slower than the Core i9-14900. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $527 cheaper!
FX-4300
- Up to 92% cheaper – $42.94 vs $569.99
- Up to 92% cheaper
- Up to 91% better value in Atomfall – $0.22 vs $2.33/FPS
- Up to 91% better value in Atomfall
Core i9-14900
- Up to 30% faster in Atomfall – 244 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 30% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-4300 vs Core i9-14900: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
187 FPS
77%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
77%
Price, $
$42.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
244 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$569.99
7%
Value, $/FPS
$2.33/FPS
9%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4300 vs Core i9-14900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4300 vs Core i9-14900 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
69%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Core i9-14900
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
53%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $549.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
