Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 3299 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of FX-4300
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $48.02 vs $269.95
- Up to 32% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-12900KF - $2.09 vs $3.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 283% better in Immortals of Aveum than FX-4300 - 88 vs 23 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 24 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 125 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.07/FPS
68%
Price, $
$269.95
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $269.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 125 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-4300 | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |