In The Last of Us Part I, the FX-4300 is slightly faster than the Core i9-12900K and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $246 cheaper!
FX-4300
- Up to 13% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 242 vs 214 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Up to 85% cheaper – $42.94 vs $289.00
- Up to 85% cheaper
- Up to 87% better value in The Last of Us Part I – $0.17 vs $1.35/FPS
- Up to 87% better value in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Core i9-12900K
- Is 9 years and 11 days newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 9 years and 11 days newer
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
FX-4300 vs Core i9-12900K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
242 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
181 FPS
100%
Price, $
$42.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
214 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
89%
Price, $
$289
14%
Value, $/FPS
$1.35/FPS
13%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4300 vs Core i9-12900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4300 vs Core i9-12900K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
13%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
77%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900K Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $599.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
