In Rust, the FX-4300 is slightly slower than the Core i7-9700F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $203 cheaper!
FX-4300
- Up to 83% cheaper – $42.94 vs $245.81
- Up to 83% cheaper
- Up to 81% better value in Rust – $0.20 vs $1.05/FPS
- Up to 81% better value in Rust
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-9700F
- Up to 11% faster in Rust – 232 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Rust
- Is 6 years and 5 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 6 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
FX-4300 vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
209 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
40 FPS
68%
Price, $
$42.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
232 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
59 FPS
100%
Price, $
$245.81
17%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
19%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4300 vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4300 vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
85%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $333.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
