In The Last of Us Part II, the FX-4300 is same performance as the Core i5-650. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $20 cheaper!
FX-4300
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer – Oct 23, 2012 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer
- Up to 32% cheaper – $42.94 vs $63.33
- Up to 32% cheaper
- Up to 32% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.21 vs $0.31/FPS
- Up to 32% better value in The Last of Us Part II
Core i5-650
- Consumes up to 23% less energy – 73 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 23% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
FX-4300 vs Core i5-650: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
203 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
152 FPS
99%
Price, $
$42.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
204 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.33
67%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
68%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4300 vs Core i5-650 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4300 vs Core i5-650 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
87%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
71%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-650 Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $176.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1156 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 73 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
