In Atomfall, the FX-4300 is slower than the Core i5-13400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-4300
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-13400F
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall – 231 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 2 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 10 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-4300 vs Core i5-13400F: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
187 FPS
81%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
81%
Price, $
$42.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4300 vs Core i5-13400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4300 vs Core i5-13400F in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
4 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
87%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
66%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13400F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $196.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
