In Deathloop, the FX-4300 is slightly faster than the Celeron G6900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-4300
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 223 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
Celeron G6900
- Is 9 years and 2 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 9 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 46 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
FX-4300 vs Celeron G6900: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
223 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4300 vs Celeron G6900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4300 vs Celeron G6900 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G6900 Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| $122.00 | MSRP | $52.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 46W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 710 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
