Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2992 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of FX-4130
- Up to 76% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - $84.01 vs $343.99
- Up to 71% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Ryzen 9 5950X - $0.19 vs $0.66 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 16% better in DOOM Eternal than FX-4130 - 522 vs 449 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 32 vs 4 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Buy for $84.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7266 minutes ago
Buy for $343.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7266 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-4130 | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |