Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 4068 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of FX-4130
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $84.01 vs $417.61
- Up to 72% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-14900KF - $0.54 vs $1.92 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 40% better in No Man's Sky than FX-4130 - 218 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 32 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $84.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
218
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.92/FPS
28%
Price, $
$417.61
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $417.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-4130 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |