The FX-4130 is the comparison's loser – it's a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-760 and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $4.02 more expensive!
Advantages of the FX-4130
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i5-760 cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Advantages of the Core i5-760
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 8% cheaper – $48.00 vs $52.02
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
FX-4130 vs Core i5-760 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-760
Jul 18th, 2010
Average FPS
167
100%
Min 1% FPS
112
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
FX-4130 vs Core i5-760 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4130 vs Core i5-760 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4130 vs Core i5-760 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4130
Aug 27th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i5-760
Jul 18th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
3.33 GHz
85%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-4130 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-760 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
| $112.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Lynnfield |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
