In Atomfall, the FX-4100 is slightly slower than the Xeon X5680. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-4100
- Is 1 year and 7 months newer – Oct 12, 2011 vs Feb 14, 2010
- Is 1 year and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 27% less energy – 95 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 27% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X5680
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall – 193 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-4100 vs Xeon X5680: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
186 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
139 FPS
96%
Price, $
$105.36
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4100 vs Xeon X5680 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4100 vs Xeon X5680 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Xeon X5680
Feb 14th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.333 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
95%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4100 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X5680 Feb 14th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2010 |
| $115.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1366 |
95W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
