In Deathloop, the FX-4100 is slightly faster than the Xeon X5660. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-4100
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 224 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer – Oct 12, 2011 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X5660
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
FX-4100 vs Xeon X5660: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
224 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
168 FPS
100%
Price, $
$105.36
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4100 vs Xeon X5660 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4100 vs Xeon X5660 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Xeon X5660
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
84%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4100 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X5660 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $115.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
