In Atomfall, the FX-4100 is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-4100
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Core Ultra 7 265K
- Up to 32% faster in Atomfall – 249 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 32% faster in Atomfall
- Is 13 years and 12 days newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 13 years and 12 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-4100 vs Core Ultra 7 265K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
188 FPS
76%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
76%
Price, $
$105.36
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
249 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4100 vs Core Ultra 7 265K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4100 vs Core Ultra 7 265K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
69%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
29%
Core Ultra 7 265K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4100 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
$115.00 | MSRP | $394.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1851 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
