In The Last of Us Part II, the FX-4100 is faster than the Core Ultra 7 265 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $243 cheaper!
FX-4100
- Up to 18% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 200 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 70% cheaper – $105.36 vs $348.52
- Up to 70% cheaper
- Up to 75% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.52 vs $2.05/FPS
- Up to 75% better value in The Last of Us Part II
Core Ultra 7 265
- Is 13 years and 2 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 13 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
FX-4100 vs Core Ultra 7 265: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
200 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
100%
Price, $
$105.36
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
170 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
85%
Price, $
$348.52
30%
Value, $/FPS
$2.05/FPS
25%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4100 vs Core Ultra 7 265 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4100 vs Core Ultra 7 265 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
29%
Core Ultra 7 265
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4100 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265 Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
$115.00 | MSRP | $394.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 32EU |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
