In Control, the FX-4100 is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 5 245K. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $85 cheaper!
FX-4100
- Up to 45% cheaper – $105.36 vs $189.99
- Up to 45% cheaper
- Up to 42% better value in Control – $0.43 vs $0.74/FPS
- Up to 42% better value in Control
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Core Ultra 5 245K
- Up to 4% faster in Control – 254 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Control
- Is 13 years and 12 days newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 13 years and 12 days newer
Control FPS Calculator
FX-4100 vs Core Ultra 5 245K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
245 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
96%
Price, $
$105.36
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
254 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.99
55%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
58%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4100 vs Core Ultra 5 245K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4100 vs Core Ultra 5 245K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
4-core
29%
L3 Cache
8 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
73%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
29%
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4100 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2024 |
$115.00 | MSRP | $319.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1851 |
95W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
