In Deathloop, the FX-4100 is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $334 cheaper!
FX-4100
- Up to 76% cheaper – $105.36 vs $438.99
- Up to 76% cheaper
- Up to 74% better value in Deathloop – $0.47 vs $1.79/FPS
- Up to 74% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Core i9-14900K
- Up to 9% faster in Deathloop – 244 vs 224 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Deathloop
- Is 12 years and 5 days newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 12 years and 5 days newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
FX-4100 vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
224 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
168 FPS
92%
Price, $
$105.36
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
244 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$438.99
24%
Value, $/FPS
$1.79/FPS
26%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4100 vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4100 vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
63%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4100 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
$115.00 | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
