In Deathloop, the FX-4100 is same performance as the Core i7-640M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-4100
- Is 1 year and 15 days newer – Oct 12, 2011 vs Sep 26, 2010
- Is 1 year and 15 days newer
Core i7-640M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
FX-4100 vs Core i7-640M: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
224 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
168 FPS
100%
Price, $
$105.36
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4100 vs Core i7-640M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4100 vs Core i7-640M in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i7-640M
Sep 26th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
3.467 GHz
91%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
57%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4100 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-640M Sep 26th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 26th, 2010 |
$115.00 | MSRP | $346.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| AM3+ | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
