In GRID, the FX-4100 is same performance as the Core i7-3770. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $24 more expensive!
FX-4100
No clear advantages
Core i7-3770
- Is 6 months and 17 days newer – Apr 29, 2012 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 6 months and 17 days newer
- Up to 23% cheaper – $80.98 vs $105.36
- Up to 23% cheaper
- Up to 24% better value in GRID – $0.16 vs $0.21/FPS
- Up to 24% better value in GRID
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 77 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
GRID FPS Calculator
FX-4100 vs Core i7-3770: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
483 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
291 FPS
100%
Price, $
$105.36
76%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
76%
Core i7-3770
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
483 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
291 FPS
100%
Price, $
$80.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4100 vs Core i7-3770 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4100 vs Core i7-3770 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
97%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i7-3770
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
86%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4100 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-3770 Apr 29th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
$115.00 | MSRP | $278.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 77W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
