In Deathloop, the FX-4100 is slightly faster than the Core i7-2600K. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $31 more expensive!
FX-4100
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 224 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Is 9 months and 2 days newer – Oct 12, 2011 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 9 months and 2 days newer
Core i7-2600K
- Up to 30% cheaper – $74.25 vs $105.36
- Up to 30% cheaper
- Up to 30% better value in Deathloop – $0.33 vs $0.47/FPS
- Up to 30% better value in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
FX-4100 vs Core i7-2600K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
224 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
168 FPS
100%
Price, $
$105.36
70%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
70%
Core i7-2600K
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
220 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
98%
Price, $
$74.25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4100 vs Core i7-2600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4100 vs Core i7-2600K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i7-2600K
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
86%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4100 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-2600K Jan 9th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
$115.00 | MSRP | $317.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 3000 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
