In Deathloop, the FX-4100 is same performance as the Core i7-10700F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $225 cheaper!
FX-4100
- Up to 68% cheaper – $105.36 vs $329.95
- Up to 68% cheaper
- Up to 68% better value in Deathloop – $0.47 vs $1.48/FPS
- Up to 68% better value in Deathloop
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-10700F
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
FX-4100 vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
223 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$105.36
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$329.95
31%
Value, $/FPS
$1.48/FPS
32%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4100 vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4100 vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
79%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
64%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4100 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $115.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
