In Deathloop, the FX-4100 is slightly faster than the Core i5-2500S. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $26 more expensive!
FX-4100
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 224 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Is 9 months and 2 days newer – Oct 12, 2011 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 9 months and 2 days newer
Core i5-2500S
- Up to 24% cheaper – $79.72 vs $105.36
- Up to 24% cheaper
- Up to 23% better value in Deathloop – $0.36 vs $0.47/FPS
- Up to 23% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
FX-4100 vs Core i5-2500S: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
224 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
168 FPS
100%
Price, $
$105.36
75%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
77%
Core i5-2500S
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
220 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
98%
Price, $
$79.72
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4100 vs Core i5-2500S in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4100 vs Core i5-2500S in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i5-2500S
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
97%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4100 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-2500S Jan 9th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| $115.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2000 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
