In Atomfall, the FX-4100 is slightly slower than the Core i5-2400S. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $75 cheaper!
FX-4100
- Is 9 months and 2 days newer – Oct 12, 2011 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 9 months and 2 days newer
- Up to 41% cheaper – $105.36 vs $179.95
- Up to 41% cheaper
- Up to 40% better value in Atomfall – $0.56 vs $0.94/FPS
- Up to 40% better value in Atomfall
Core i5-2400S
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 190 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-4100 vs Core i5-2400S: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
187 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
98%
Price, $
$105.36
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
100%
Core i5-2400S
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
190 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
143 FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.95
58%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
60%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4100 vs Core i5-2400S in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4100 vs Core i5-2400S in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i5-2400S
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
87%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4100 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-2400S Jan 9th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| $115.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2000 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
