In Deathloop, the FX-4100 is slightly slower than the Core i3-370M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-4100
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer – Oct 12, 2011 vs Jun 20, 2010
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer
Core i3-370M
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 224 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
FX-4100 vs Core i3-370M: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
222 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
99%
Price, $
$105.36
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4100 vs Core i3-370M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4100 vs Core i3-370M in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i3-370M
Jun 20th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4100 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-370M Jun 20th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2010 |
| $115.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
