In Atomfall, the FX-4100 is slightly faster than the Core i3-2310M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-4100
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 186 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 months and 9 days newer – Oct 12, 2011 vs Feb 01, 2011
- Is 8 months and 9 days newer
Core i3-2310M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-4100 vs Core i3-2310M: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
186 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
139 FPS
100%
Price, $
$105.36
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4100 vs Core i3-2310M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4100 vs Core i3-2310M in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i3-2310M
Feb 1st, 2011
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
58%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4100 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-2310M Feb 1st, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Feb 1st, 2011 |
| $115.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| AM3+ | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 3000 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
