In Minecraft, the FX-4100 is same performance as the Celeron G3930. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $76 more expensive!
FX-4100
No clear advantages
Celeron G3930
- Is 5 years and 2 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 5 years and 2 months newer
- Up to 72% cheaper – $29.00 vs $105.36
- Up to 72% cheaper
- Up to 78% better value in Minecraft – $0.02 vs $0.09/FPS
- Up to 78% better value in Minecraft
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 51 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Minecraft FPS Calculator
FX-4100 vs Celeron G3930: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
1059 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
185 FPS
97%
Price, $
$105.36
27%
Value, $/FPS
$0.09/FPS
22%
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
1058 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
190 FPS
100%
Price, $
$29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.02/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4100 vs Celeron G3930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4100 vs Celeron G3930 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
78%
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4100 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G3930 Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| $115.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 51W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 610 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
