In Minecraft, the FX-4100 is same performance as the Celeron G1610. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $56 more expensive!
FX-4100
No clear advantages
Celeron G1610
- Is 1 year and 1 month newer – Dec 03, 2012 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 1 year and 1 month newer
- Up to 53% cheaper – $49.00 vs $105.36
- Up to 53% cheaper
- Up to 56% better value in Minecraft – $0.04 vs $0.09/FPS
- Up to 56% better value in Minecraft
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 55 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 42% less energy
Minecraft FPS Calculator
FX-4100 vs Celeron G1610: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
1060 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$105.36
46%
Value, $/FPS
$0.09/FPS
44%
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
1060 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.04/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4100 vs Celeron G1610 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4100 vs Celeron G1610 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4100 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G1610 Dec 3rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| $115.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 55W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
