EPYC 9684X vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The EPYC 9684X is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Xeon E5-2699A v4. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 9684X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 192 vs 44 threads
Advantages of the Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 145 vs 400 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
EPYC 9684X
Jun 13th, 2023
Average FPS
216
100%
Min 1% FPS
147
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
188
87%
Min 1% FPS
129
88%
Price, $
$1595.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.48/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 9684X vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 9684X vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 9684X
Jun 13th, 2023
Cores
96-core
100%
L3 Cache
1152 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.55 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Cores
22-core
23%
L3 Cache
55 MB
5%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
97%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
50%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
EPYC 9684X | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 13th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
| $14,756.00 | MSRP | $4,938.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
| 400 W | Power Consumption | 145 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR5 @ 4800 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
