The EPYC 9684X is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8300. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 9684X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 192 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the FX-8300
- Consumes up to 76% less energy – 95 vs 400 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
EPYC 9684X vs FX-8300 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 9684X
Jun 13th, 2023
Average FPS
736
100%
Min 1% FPS
386
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
EPYC 9684X vs FX-8300 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 9684X vs FX-8300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 9684X vs FX-8300 in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 9684X
Jun 13th, 2023
Cores
96-core
100%
L3 Cache
1152 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.55 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
88%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
8%
L3 Cache
8 MB
1%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 9684X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8300 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 13th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| $14,756.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Not Available | Codename | Vishera |
| 400 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
96 | Cores | 8 |
192 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
1152 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR5 @ 4800 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
