The EPYC 9684X is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Celeron G3930. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 9684X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 192 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 87% less energy – 51 vs 400 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
EPYC 9684X vs Celeron G3930
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 9684X
Jun 13th, 2023
Average FPS
216
100%
Min 1% FPS
148
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
EPYC 9684X vs Celeron G3930 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 9684X vs Celeron G3930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 9684X vs Celeron G3930 in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 9684X
Jun 13th, 2023
Cores
96-core
100%
L3 Cache
1152 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.55 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
2%
L3 Cache
2 MB
0%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
50%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 9684X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 13th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| $14,756.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Genoa-X | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| 400 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
| Performance | ||
96 | Cores | 2 |
192 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
1152 MB | L3 Cache | 2 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR5 @ 4800 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
