The EPYC 9554P is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-6300. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 9554P
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 128 vs 6 threads
Advantages of the FX-6300
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 95 vs 360 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
EPYC 9554P vs FX-6300 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 9554P
Nov 10th, 2022
Average FPS
728
100%
Min 1% FPS
385
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
EPYC 9554P vs FX-6300 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 9554P vs FX-6300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 9554P vs FX-6300 in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 9554P
Nov 10th, 2022
Cores
64-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
3.75 GHz
91%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
6-core
9%
L3 Cache
8 MB
3%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 9554P | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Nov 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| $7,104.00 | MSRP | $132.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Not Available | Codename | Vishera |
| 360 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
64 | Cores | 6 |
128 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 GHz |
256 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR5 @ 4800 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
