The EPYC 9374F is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Celeron G4900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 9374F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 64 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 83% less energy – 54 vs 320 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
EPYC 9374F vs Celeron G4900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 9374F
Nov 10th, 2022
Average FPS
158
100%
Min 1% FPS
111
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
EPYC 9374F vs Celeron G4900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 9374F vs Celeron G4900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 9374F vs Celeron G4900 in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 9374F
Nov 10th, 2022
Cores
32-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.85 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Celeron G4900
Apr 3rd, 2018
Cores
2-core
6%
L3 Cache
2 MB
1%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
50%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 9374F | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Nov 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
$4,850.00 | MSRP | $42.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket SP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Not Available | Codename | Coffee Lake |
320 W | Power Consumption | 54 W |
Performance | ||
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
256 MB | L3 Cache | 2 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR5 @ 4800 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |