Key Differences
In short — EPYC 9174F outperforms Core i7-12700K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 9174F is 371 days newer than Core i7-12700K.
Advantages of EPYC 9174F
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield V than Core i7-12700K - 282 vs 278 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-12700K - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Core i7-12700K
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than AMD EPYC 9174F - 125 vs 320 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 9174F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $195 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6573 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Nov 10th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 9174F | vs | Core i7-12700K |
---|---|---|
Nov 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
Not Available | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
320 W | TDP | 125 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |