Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms EPYC 9174F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 371 days older than EPYC 9174F.
Advantages of EPYC 9174F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12600K - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 5% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than EPYC 9174F - 98 vs 93 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than AMD EPYC 9174F - 125 vs 320 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 9174F doesn't have integrated graphics
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.77/FPS
100%
Price, $
$173
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $173 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6753 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Server/Workstation • Nov 10th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 9174F | vs | Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Nov 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Not Available | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
320 W | TDP | 125 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |