The EPYC 7F52 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Xeon E5-2699A v4. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 7F52
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
Advantages of the Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Consumes up to 40% less energy – 145 vs 240 Watts
EPYC 7F52 vs Xeon E5-2699A v4
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 7F52
Apr 14th, 2020
Average FPS
202
100%
Min 1% FPS
139
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
188
93%
Min 1% FPS
129
93%
Price, $
$1595.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.48/FPS
100%
EPYC 7F52 vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7F52 vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7F52 vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7F52
Apr 14th, 2020
Cores
16-core
73%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Cores
22-core
100%
L3 Cache
55 MB
21%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
92%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
75%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7F52 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $4,938.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
| Rome | Codename | Broadwell-EP |
| 240 W | Power Consumption | 145 W |
| Performance | ||
| 16 | Cores | 22 |
| 32 | Threads | 44 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
256 MB | L3 Cache | 55 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
