The EPYC 7F52 is a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-9900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 7F52
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of the Core i9-9900
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 65 vs 240 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
EPYC 7F52 vs Core i9-9900
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 7F52
Apr 14th, 2020
Average FPS
202
98%
Min 1% FPS
139
98%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
207
100%
Min 1% FPS
142
100%
Price, $
$291
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.4/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7F52 vs Core i9-9900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7F52 vs Core i9-9900 in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7F52
Apr 14th, 2020
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
78%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
50%
L3 Cache
16 MB
6%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7F52 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-9900 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $423.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Rome | Codename | Coffee Lake-R |
| 240 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.0 GHz |
256 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
