The EPYC 7F52 is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-13600K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 7F52
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-13600K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 125 vs 240 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
EPYC 7F52 vs Core i5-13600K
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 7F52
Apr 14th, 2020
Average FPS
202
87%
Min 1% FPS
139
88%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-13600K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
233
100%
Min 1% FPS
158
100%
Price, $
$359.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.54/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7F52 vs Core i5-13600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7F52 vs Core i5-13600K in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7F52
Apr 14th, 2020
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
76%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
57%
Core i5-13600K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
14-core
88%
L3 Cache
24 MB
9%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7F52 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $319.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Rome | Codename | Raptor Lake-S |
| 240 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
16 | Cores | 14 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.1 GHz |
256 MB | L3 Cache | 24 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
