The EPYC 7F52 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Athlon 200GE. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 7F52
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Athlon 200GE
- Consumes up to 85% less energy – 35 vs 240 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the EPYC 7F52 cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
EPYC 7F52 vs Athlon 200GE for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 7F52
Apr 14th, 2020
Average FPS
186
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Athlon 200GE
Sep 6th, 2018
Average FPS
176
95%
Min 1% FPS
118
96%
Price, $
$69.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
EPYC 7F52 vs Athlon 200GE in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7F52 vs Athlon 200GE in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7F52 vs Athlon 200GE in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7F52
Apr 14th, 2020
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Athlon 200GE
Sep 6th, 2018
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
4 MB
2%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7F52 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Not Available | MSRP | $55.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Not Available | Codename | Raven Ridge |
240 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
Performance | ||
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
256 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | No |