The EPYC 7742 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-9100F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $1566.44 more expensive!
Advantages of the EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 128 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i3-9100F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 95% cheaper – $87.00 vs $1653.44
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 65 vs 225 Watts
EPYC 7742 vs Core i3-9100F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
206
100%
Min 1% FPS
143
100%
Price, $
$87
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
EPYC 7742 vs Core i3-9100F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7742 vs Core i3-9100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7742 vs Core i3-9100F in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7742
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
64-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.25 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
81%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
6%
L3 Cache
6 MB
2%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
75%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7742 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-9100F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $122.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Rome | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| 225 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
64 | Cores | 4 |
128 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
256 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
