The EPYC 7702P is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-12900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 7702P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 128 vs 24 threads
Advantages of the Core i9-12900K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 125 vs 200 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
EPYC 7702P vs Core i9-12900K
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 7702P
Aug 7th, 2019
Average FPS
196
84%
Min 1% FPS
134
85%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
232
100%
Min 1% FPS
157
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.16/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7702P vs Core i9-12900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7702P vs Core i9-12900K in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7702P
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
64-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
3.35 GHz
64%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
67%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
25%
L3 Cache
30 MB
12%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7702P | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-12900K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $599.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Rome | Codename | Alder Lake-S |
| 200 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
64 | Cores | 16 |
128 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 GHz |
256 MB | L3 Cache | 30 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
