The EPYC 7702 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-13900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 7702
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 128 vs 32 threads
Advantages of the Core i9-13900K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 125 vs 200 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
EPYC 7702 vs Core i9-13900K
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 7702
Aug 7th, 2019
Average FPS
199
83%
Min 1% FPS
136
83%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
241
100%
Min 1% FPS
163
100%
Price, $
$510.18
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.11/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7702 vs Core i9-13900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7702 vs Core i9-13900K in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7702
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
64-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
3.35 GHz
58%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
57%
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
38%
L3 Cache
36 MB
14%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7702 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-13900K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $589.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Rome | Codename | Raptor Lake-S |
| 200 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
64 | Cores | 24 |
128 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.8 GHz |
256 MB | L3 Cache | 36 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
