The EPYC 7702 is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-7640X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 7702
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 128 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-7640X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 44% less energy – 112 vs 200 Watts
EPYC 7702 vs Core i5-7640X for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 7702
Aug 7th, 2019
Average FPS
181
93%
Min 1% FPS
120
94%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-7640X
Jun 26th, 2017
Average FPS
194
100%
Min 1% FPS
128
100%
Price, $
$331.32
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.7/FPS
100%
EPYC 7702 vs Core i5-7640X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7702 vs Core i5-7640X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7702 vs Core i5-7640X in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7702
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
64-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
50%
Turbo Frequency
3.35 GHz
80%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i5-7640X
Jun 26th, 2017
Cores
4-core
6%
L3 Cache
6 MB
2%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7702 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-7640X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
| Not Available | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| 200 W | Power Consumption | 112 W |
| Performance | ||
64 | Cores | 4 |
128 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
256 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
