EPYC 7642 vs Core i9-13900KF in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The EPYC 7642 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-13900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 7642
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 96 vs 32 threads
Advantages of the Core i9-13900KF
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 44% less energy – 125 vs 225 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
EPYC 7642
Aug 7th, 2019
Average FPS
197
82%
Min 1% FPS
135
83%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
240
100%
Min 1% FPS
163
100%
Price, $
$426
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.77/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7642 vs Core i9-13900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7642 vs Core i9-13900KF in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7642
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
48-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
59%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
57%
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
50%
L3 Cache
36 MB
14%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
EPYC 7642 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900KF |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $564.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| 225 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
