The EPYC 75F3 is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-12900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 75F3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 64 vs 24 threads
Advantages of the Core i9-12900K
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 125 vs 280 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
EPYC 75F3 vs Core i9-12900K
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 75F3
Mar 15th, 2021
Average FPS
211
91%
Min 1% FPS
144
92%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
232
100%
Min 1% FPS
157
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.16/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 75F3 vs Core i9-12900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 75F3 vs Core i9-12900K in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 75F3
Mar 15th, 2021
Cores
32-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.95 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
67%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
50%
L3 Cache
30 MB
12%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 75F3 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-12900K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| $4,860.00 | MSRP | $599.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Milan | Codename | Alder Lake-S |
| 280 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
32 | Cores | 16 |
64 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 GHz |
256 MB | L3 Cache | 30 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
