Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms EPYC 7551 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2015 days newer than EPYC 7551.
Advantages of EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 64 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 17% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than EPYC 7551 - 146 vs 125 FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
146
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$849.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $849.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7235 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7551 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Naples | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 10 |
64 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |