The EPYC 7542 is a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-6300. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 7542
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i3-6300
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 51 vs 225 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the EPYC 7542 cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
EPYC 7542 vs Core i3-6300 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 7542
Aug 7th, 2019
Average FPS
180
98%
Min 1% FPS
120
99%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-6300
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
183
100%
Min 1% FPS
121
100%
Price, $
$108.7
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
EPYC 7542 vs Core i3-6300 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7542 vs Core i3-6300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7542 vs Core i3-6300 in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7542
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
32-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i3-6300
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
6%
L3 Cache
4 MB
3%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7542 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-6300 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Rome | Codename | Skylake |
225 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
Performance | ||
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
128 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2133 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |