The EPYC 7502P is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Celeron G4900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 7502P
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 64 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 70% less energy – 54 vs 180 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
EPYC 7502P vs Celeron G4900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 7502P
Aug 7th, 2019
Average FPS
177
100%
Min 1% FPS
118
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
EPYC 7502P vs Celeron G4900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7502P vs Celeron G4900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7502P vs Celeron G4900 in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7502P
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
32-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
3.35 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Celeron G4900
Apr 3rd, 2018
Cores
2-core
6%
L3 Cache
2 MB
2%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
75%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7502P | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $42.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Not Available | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| 180 W | Power Consumption | 54 W |
| Performance | ||
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
128 MB | L3 Cache | 2 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
