The EPYC 7502 is the comparison's loser – it's a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-9820X and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $271.96 more expensive!
Advantages of the EPYC 7502
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 64 vs 20 threads
Advantages of the Core i9-9820X
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 30% cheaper – $623.04 vs $895.00
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 8% less energy – 165 vs 180 Watts
EPYC 7502 vs Core i9-9820X
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-9820X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
201
100%
Min 1% FPS
138
100%
Price, $
$623.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.09/FPS
100%
EPYC 7502 vs Core i9-9820X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7502 vs Core i9-9820X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7502 vs Core i9-9820X in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7502
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
32-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
3.35 GHz
80%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i9-9820X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
10-core
31%
L3 Cache
16.5 MB
13%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7502 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-9820X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $889.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
| Rome | Codename | Skylake-X |
| 180 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Performance | ||
32 | Cores | 10 |
64 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
128 MB | L3 Cache | 16.5 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
