The EPYC 74F3 is a slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-10900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 74F3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 48 vs 20 threads
Advantages of the Core i9-10900F
- A faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 65 vs 240 Watts
EPYC 74F3 vs Core i9-10900F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 74F3
Mar 15th, 2021
Average FPS
187
97%
Min 1% FPS
124
98%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, $
$258.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.34/FPS
100%
EPYC 74F3 vs Core i9-10900F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 74F3 vs Core i9-10900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 74F3 vs Core i9-10900F in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 74F3
Mar 15th, 2021
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
42%
L3 Cache
20 MB
8%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
92%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 74F3 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $2,900.00 | MSRP | $464.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Not Available | Codename | Comet Lake |
| 240 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
24 | Cores | 10 |
48 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 GHz |
256 MB | L3 Cache | 20 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
